Thanks to some folks lobbying on my behalf, I got my LinkedIn account back. I did have to agree to not post any more “misinformation” - which I take to mean any information that doesn’t align to the prevailing US public health authority viewpoint, regardless of the validity of the argument.
So, my focus remains to post COVID-19 related content here and use LinkedIn mainly as a career networking site. In responding, I did maintain that the information that I was flagged for was not misinformation according to an actual definition of that word, in that the information was backed up by multiple scientific studies, including peer-reviewed ones.
I’ve saved my response for posterity here. https://authintel.com/li-response.pdf
I make a recommendation that LI should consider evaluating their content moderation practices, given the grave harm that could be caused by suppressing scientific discussion that could improve the response to the pandemic. Also, I provided documentation supporting that the assertion that my posts were not “misinformation”. And I shared with them that by labeling my content misinformation and banning me from the platform, they damaged my reputation and career. I questioned why they didn’t ban me for violating their policy on opposing “global” health authorities (which I also questioned since who is the global health authority - the FDA, WHO, CDC, or what about other countries?), so that seemed an ambiguous policy anyways.
They did not respond to any of this but restored my access based on my commitment to no longer post any content that might violate LI policy.
I have a slinked in account, have for 15 or more years. Dont really use it, always find work other ways. When Steve Kirsch got kicked off, I decided to do an experiment and post something about the WHACK SCENE, see below. After 2 months not a peep, no warnings, my page still there last I checked. Did get a few 'thanks' for the post, just a list of why I will not be jabbed. I am trying to find the author, because I would like to credit them, some science based person. This is on my slinked in now....here is what i posted and yep its still there, but now a bit further down the page..
WHY I REFUSE THE mNRA GENETIC THERAPY INJECTIONS
1) It has been shown by multiple biodistribution studies that the “vaccines” do not stay at the injection site, but cross into the bloodstream and even pass through the blood brain barrier. [1],[2],[3].
2) It has also been shown that the spike protein, also in isolation from the whole virus, causes blood clots to form through several mechanisms. [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. This is further confirmed by evidence from autopsies [9], [10], as well as from the exploding numbers in vaccine injury reporting systems (such as VAERS) all over the world.
Therefore, I conclude that the vaccines are unacceptably dangerous.
3) Natural immunity is better, broader, longer lasting, and has better cross reactivity against other strains. By contrast, the antibodies induced by the vaccines are oligoclonal and tend to be non-neutralizing for different strains, raising concerns for ADE. [11], [12], [13], [14]
Therefore, I conclude that the vaccines are ineffective in the long term. possibly even detrimental.
Considering that, at this point, there are many highly effective treatments available, especially if started early on, I see no point in investing in these questionable “vaccines” as opposed to therapeutics.
[1] A. Ogata et al: “Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients”.
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA): “Assessment report – COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna”, Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/005791/0000; page 47/169, last paragraph.
[3] K. Bahl et al: “Preclinical and Clinical Demonstration of Immunogenicity by mRNA Vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 Influenza Viruses”; page 1319, Table 1; and page 1325, “Biodistribution Studies”.
[4] S. Theuerkauf et al: “Quantitative assays reveal cell fusion at minimal levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and fusion from without”.
[5] Y. Lei et al: “SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impai0.rs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2”.
[6] S. Zhang et al: “SARS-CoV-2 binds platelet ACE2 to enhance thrombosis in COVID-19”.
[7] E. Avolio et al: “The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein disrupts the cooperative function of human cardiac pericytes – endothelial cells through CD147 receptor-mediated signalling: a potential non-infective mechanism of COVID-19 microvascular disease”. [8] P. Solopov: “SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alone may cause lung damage”.
[9] D. Wichmann et al: “Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With COVID-19 – A Prospective Cohort Study”
[10] T. Hansen et al: “First case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against
SARS-CoV-2”
[11] S. Nielsen et al. “SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless ofdisease severity”
[12] L. Wang et al: “Ultrapotent antibodies against diverse and highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants”
[13] A. Israel et al: “Large-scale study of antibody titer decay following BNT162b2
mRNA vaccine or SARS-CoV-2 infection”
[14] S. Gazit et al: “Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections”
I have a slinked in account, have for 15 or more years. Dont really use it, always find work other ways. When Steve Kirsch got kicked off, I decided to do an experiment and post something about the WHACK SCENE, see below. After 2 months not a peep, no warnings, my page still there last I checked. Did get a few 'thanks' for the post, just a list of why I will not be jabbed. I am trying to find the author, because I would like to credit them, some science based person. This is on my slinked in now....here is what i posted and yep its still there, but now a bit further down the page..
WHY I REFUSE THE mNRA GENETIC THERAPY INJECTIONS
1) It has been shown by multiple biodistribution studies that the “vaccines” do not stay at the injection site, but cross into the bloodstream and even pass through the blood brain barrier. [1],[2],[3].
2) It has also been shown that the spike protein, also in isolation from the whole virus, causes blood clots to form through several mechanisms. [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. This is further confirmed by evidence from autopsies [9], [10], as well as from the exploding numbers in vaccine injury reporting systems (such as VAERS) all over the world.
Therefore, I conclude that the vaccines are unacceptably dangerous.
3) Natural immunity is better, broader, longer lasting, and has better cross reactivity against other strains. By contrast, the antibodies induced by the vaccines are oligoclonal and tend to be non-neutralizing for different strains, raising concerns for ADE. [11], [12], [13], [14]
Therefore, I conclude that the vaccines are ineffective in the long term. possibly even detrimental.
Considering that, at this point, there are many highly effective treatments available, especially if started early on, I see no point in investing in these questionable “vaccines” as opposed to therapeutics.
[1] A. Ogata et al: “Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients”.
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA): “Assessment report – COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna”, Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/005791/0000; page 47/169, last paragraph.
[3] K. Bahl et al: “Preclinical and Clinical Demonstration of Immunogenicity by mRNA Vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 Influenza Viruses”; page 1319, Table 1; and page 1325, “Biodistribution Studies”.
[4] S. Theuerkauf et al: “Quantitative assays reveal cell fusion at minimal levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and fusion from without”.
[5] Y. Lei et al: “SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impai0.rs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2”.
[6] S. Zhang et al: “SARS-CoV-2 binds platelet ACE2 to enhance thrombosis in COVID-19”.
[7] E. Avolio et al: “The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein disrupts the cooperative function of human cardiac pericytes – endothelial cells through CD147 receptor-mediated signalling: a potential non-infective mechanism of COVID-19 microvascular disease”. [8] P. Solopov: “SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alone may cause lung damage”.
[9] D. Wichmann et al: “Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With COVID-19 – A Prospective Cohort Study”
[10] T. Hansen et al: “First case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against
SARS-CoV-2”
[11] S. Nielsen et al. “SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless ofdisease severity”
[12] L. Wang et al: “Ultrapotent antibodies against diverse and highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants”
[13] A. Israel et al: “Large-scale study of antibody titer decay following BNT162b2
mRNA vaccine or SARS-CoV-2 infection”
[14] S. Gazit et al: “Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections”